Need a Criminal Law lawyer in NSW?

Speak to a qualified local lawyer today. Free 24/7 hotline or book a consultation.

It is common for a person to be sentenced for multiple offences on the same occasion. This can occur when multiple charges arise out of the same incident or when multiple charges arise from different incidents but are finalised together. In these situations, the court may impose two or more terms of imprisonment in respect of different charges. These sentences may be made concurrent or consecutive. This page deals with concurrent and consecutive sentences in New South Wales.

Legislation

The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 contains provisions setting out when concurrent and consecutive sentences must be imposed in New South Wales.

Concurrent sentences

Concurrent sentences are sentences of imprisonment that are served at the same time. For example, if a person is sentenced to 12 months imprisonment for Offence 1 and six months for Offence 2 and the terms are to be served concurrently, the total effective sentence (that is, the time that the person will actually serve) is 12 months imprisonment.

Consecutive sentences

Consecutive sentences are sentences of imprisonment that are served one after the other. For example, if a person is sentenced to 12 months imprisonment for Offence 1 and six months for Offence 2 and the terms are to be served consecutively, the total effective sentence is 18 months imprisonment.

Partly consecutive sentences

When a court imposes partially consecutive sentences, part of the second sentence will be served at the same time as the first sentence and the remainder will be served after the first sentence has finished. For example, if a person is sentenced to 12 months imprisonment for Offence 1 and six months for Offence 2, with two months to be served consecutively, the total effective sentence is 14 months.   

The totality principle

When a court sentences a person for multiple offences, the aggregate sentence must be ‘just and appropriate’ to the totality of the offending. The overall sentence must not be too harsh or too lenient.

In 1979, DA Thomas expressed the common law principle of totality as follows:

The effect of the totality principle is to require a sentencer who has passed a series of sentences, each properly calculated in relation to the offence for which it is imposed and each properly made consecutive in accordance with the principles governing consecutive sentences, to review the aggregate sentence and consider whether the aggregate is ‘just and appropriate’. The principle has been stated many times in various forms: ‘when a number of offences are being dealt with and specific punishments in respect of them are being totted up to make a total, it is always necessary for the court to take a last look at the total just to see whether it looks wrong[’]; ‘when … cases of multiplicity of offences come before the court, the court must not content itself by doing the arithmetic and passing the sentence which the arithmetic produces. It must look at the totality of the criminal behaviour and ask itself what is the appropriate sentence for all the offences.

Under section 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, a court in New South Wales can apply the principle of totality by imposing an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for two or more offences instead of imposing separate sentences for each offence.

Should a sentence be concurrent or consecutive?

There is no general rule as to whether sentences should be concurrent or consecutive. The court must consider whether the sentence for one offence can encompass the criminality of all offences. Factors that may be taken into account are:

  • Whether the offending is all of a similar nature
  • Whether all the offences were committed against the same victim
  • Whether all the offending arose out of one criminal enterprise
  • Whether offences committed during the same episode are of a similar nature.

In a case where there has been significant violence on two or more occasions that are distinct and separate, or where the victim is different, the court will generally order at least partially consecutive sentences.

If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.  

Free legal hotline — live now

Need a Criminal Law lawyer in NSW?

Speak to a qualified local lawyer now — free 24/7 hotline, no obligation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the totality principle affect concurrent and consecutive sentences in NSW?

The totality principle requires that the aggregate sentence must be 'just and appropriate' to the totality of offending, ensuring the overall sentence is neither too harsh nor too lenient. Courts must consider whether consecutive sentences would result in an excessive total term and may adjust individual sentences or make them concurrent to achieve a proportionate outcome that reflects the overall criminality involved.

What NSW legislation governs when concurrent or consecutive sentences must be imposed?

The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 contains the provisions that set out when concurrent and consecutive sentences must be imposed in New South Wales. Section 56 of this Act specifically addresses the circumstances under which courts must order sentences to run concurrently or consecutively, providing the statutory framework for judicial decision-making in multiple offence sentencing scenarios.

How much does it cost to get legal advice about concurrent and consecutive sentences?

Go To Court Lawyers offers a fixed consultation fee of $295 to discuss your concurrent and consecutive sentencing matter. During this consultation, an experienced criminal lawyer will assess your case, explain how the different sentencing options might apply to your charges, and provide strategic advice on achieving the most favourable outcome for your specific circumstances.

How can a criminal lawyer help with concurrent and consecutive sentencing matters?

A criminal lawyer can prepare compelling submissions arguing for concurrent rather than consecutive sentences, present mitigating factors to influence the court's decision, and ensure the totality principle is properly applied to avoid excessive aggregate sentences. They can also negotiate with prosecutors regarding sentence recommendations and develop strategic approaches to minimise your total effective sentence across multiple charges.

Is there a time limit to appeal concurrent or consecutive sentencing decisions?

Yes, there are strict time limits for appealing sentencing decisions in NSW. Generally, you have 28 days from the date of sentence to lodge an appeal against the severity of sentence or the decision to impose consecutive rather than concurrent terms. It's crucial to seek immediate legal advice if you believe your sentences were inappropriately structured, as these deadlines are strictly enforced.