Breach DVO Offences (NT)

By James Stevens, Director and Solicitor, Go To Court Lawyers. Last reviewed 15 April 2026.

An offence very commonly dealt with in the Northern Territory Local Courts and Youth Justice Courts is the offence of contravening a Domestic Violence Order (DVO). A DVO can be breached in a number of ways, including by assaulting the protected person and by having contact with the protected person when contact is forbidden under the order. The offence of breach DVO is commonly charged together with other offences arising out of the same incident, such as aggravated assault or criminal damage. This article outlines the offence of breaching a DVO in the NT.

Legislation

Section 120 of the Domestic and Family Violence Act 2007 contains the offence of breach DVO. A person is guilty of an offence if they engage in conduct that amounts to a contravention of a DVO that is in force against them.

In order to be found guilty of this offence, the person must have been given a copy of the DVO.

Breach DVO penalty

Under section 121 of the Domestic and Family Violence Act 2007, a person who breaches a DVO is liable to a fine of up to 200 penalty units or imprisonment for up to two years. If a person is found guilty of their second offence of breach DVO or is being sentenced for three or more offences of breach DVO that occurred within a 28-day period, the maximum penalty increases to three years imprisonment. If the offence involves harm or a threat, the maximum penalty that applies is five years imprisonment.

Mandatory sentencing

In 2025, the NT government reintroduced mandatory sentencing for breach DVO offences. However, the new mandatory sentencing scheme operates differently to the old one, which was repealed in 2022.

Under the new laws, a court must sentence a person to actual imprisonment if they are found guilty of a breach DVO offence and:

• the offence involved harm or a threat
• the offence is their second or subsequent breach DVO offence
• they are being sentenced for three or more breach DVO offences that occurred within a period of 28 days.

The new mandatory sentencing scheme does not set a minimum term of imprisonment. It only requires that the court impose actual imprisonment (not a term of imprisonment that is wholly suspended).  

What is breach DVO?

A wide range of actions can form the basis of a charge of breaching a DVO, depending on the conditions of the DVO. The following are common breaches:

• Having contact with the protected person when there is a condition that the defendant is not to contact the protected person;
• Being intoxicated with alcohol or drugs in the presence of the protected person when the DVO specifies that the defendant is not to have contact with the protected person while intoxicated;
• Assaulting the protected person;
• Verbally abusing the protected person;
• Damaging property belonging to the protected person;
• Asking another person to pass a message on to the protected person when the DVO has a condition that the defendant is not to contact the protected person directly or indirectly.

What if the protected person initiated the breach?

It is common for a charge of breach DVO to arise from a situation where the protected person initiated contact with the defendant. It is important to be aware that in this situation, it is still the defendant who is legally at fault. This is because a DVO restrains the defendant from doing certain things. It does not restrain the protected person.

The only situation where the protected person in a DVO would get in trouble for initiating contact with the defendant is if there were reciprocal DVOs and the protected person was the defendant in the other order. The following scenarios illustrate this.

Scenario 1

Person A has a DVO against Person B. The DVO states that Person B is not to contact Person A directly or indirectly.  

Person A then contacts Person B and asks him to come to her house. Person B comes to Person A’s house and the police attend and find him there.

Person B is in breach of the DVO.

Scenario 2

Person A and Person B have reciprocal DVOs against each other. In one DVO, Person A is the protected person and Person B is the defendant. In the other DVO, Person B is the protected person and Person A is the defendant. Both DVOs state that the defendant is not to have contact with the protected person while intoxicated.

Person A and Person B get drunk together. Both are in breach of a DVO.

Strict liability

The offence of breach DVO is a strict liability offence. This means that a person can be found guilty regardless of whether they intended or foresaw that the DVO would be breached.

The only defence that can be relied on in relation to a strict liability offence is that of honest and reasonable mistake of fact. A person would not be guilty of a breach DVO offence in the following circumstances:

• The defendant in a DVO with a condition not to contact the protected person saw the protected person in the street and mistook her for someone else. He approached her and said hello, before realising his mistake.
• The defendant in a DVO with a condition not to have contact with the protected person while intoxicated drank what she believed to be a non-alcoholic beverage while with the protected person. The drink turned out to have alcohol in it.

It is important to note that the defence of honest and reasonable mistake relates to mistakes of fact and not to mistakes of law. If a person is mistaken about the law in relation to DVOs, this does not provide them with a defence.

If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers