Need a Criminal Law lawyer in NSW?

Speak to a qualified local lawyer today. Free 24/7 hotline or book a consultation.


Have you been pulled over by the police and had your vehicle searched? Are you wondering whether the police were entitled to do so? In New South Wales, the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 empowers police to stop, search and detain you where they have reasonable grounds or a reasonable suspicion that you have committed an offence. But what exactly is a reasonable suspicion? 

What must police suspect? 

Under Section 21 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, police must suspect one or more of the following on reasonable grounds before they can search a person:

  • That they possess or control property that is stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained, or that has been used or is intended to be used to commit an offence;
  • That they possess a dangerous article in a public place that has been used, or is intended to be used, to commit an offence; or
  • That they possess or controls an illegal drug or plant.

R v Rondo

The 2001 NSW Court of Criminal Appeal case R v Rondo is the leading authority on the meaning of “reasonable suspicion.” In this case, a 20-year-old man, Rondo was driving his mother’s car. Two officers pulled Rondo over and enquired about some rear panel damage to the vehicle. Rondo advised the officers that the car belonged to his mother. The officers then saw Rondo reach over and place something in the glove box of the vehicle. This formed the basis for a reasonable suspicion for the officers to search Rondo’s car. 

A sum of money and a quantity of cannabis were then seized from the vehicle and subsequently, Rondo was charged. On a later search of Rondo’s home, police located 215 grams of cannabis and 59 cannabis plants. A jury found Mr Rondo guilty of supplying a prohibited drug and cultivation of a prohibited plant

Is a suspicion reasonable? 

In R v Rondo, the court stated,

“reasonable suspicion involves less than a reasonable belief but more than a possibility. There must be something which would create in the mind of a reasonable person an apprehension or fear ...A reason to suspect that a fact exists is more than a reason to consider or look into the possibility of its existence.”

Reasonable suspicion is not formed arbitrarily. Some factual basis for the suspicion must be shown. A suspicion may be based on hearsay material or materials which may be inadmissible in evidence. The materials must have some probative value. 

What is important in determining whether a suspicion is reasonable is the information in the mind of the police officer who stops the person or the vehicle or makes the arrest at the time he does so. Having ascertained that information the question is whether that information afforded the officer reasonable grounds for the suspicion which the police officer formed. In answering that question regard must be had to the source of the information and its content, seen in the light of the whole of the surrounding circumstances.”

If you believe that the police searched you without a reasonable suspicion then it may be possible to have any charges that resulted from the search dismissed. In order to do so you would need to show that police did not have a reasonable suspicion to justify searching you. If this can be demonstrated then the evidence found during the search will be deemed inadmissible. 

Streat v Bauer; Steat v Blanco 

In the case of Streat v Bauer; Streat v Blanco, the defendants were charged with hindering police after police pulled their car over and they were searched. Police said they had a reasonable suspicion because of the time and place, the fact that three men were in in the car, and a suggestion from police radio that it was a “suspect” vehicle that may be involved in offences. 

When the car was stopped, the police said, the defendants strongly objected to being searched. The magistrate dismissed the charges, finding that none of these factors provided reasonable grounds for suspicion and therefore the police were not acting lawfully in the execution of their duty. 

If you require legal advice or representation in a criminal law matter or in any other legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.

Free legal hotline — live now

Need a Criminal Law lawyer in NSW?

Speak to a qualified local lawyer now — free 24/7 hotline, no obligation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What constitutes a 'reasonable suspicion' for police to conduct a search in NSW?

Reasonable suspicion involves less than reasonable belief but more than a possibility. It requires some factual basis for the suspicion, not just a mere possibility. The suspicion must be based on objective circumstances that would lead a reasonable person in the officer's position to suspect criminal activity. Police cannot rely solely on hunches, speculation, or generalised suspicions without specific facts supporting their belief.

Can NSW police search my car without a warrant during a routine traffic stop?

Yes, NSW police can search your vehicle without a warrant if they have reasonable suspicion under Section 21 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002. They must reasonably suspect you possess stolen property, dangerous articles used for offences, or illegal drugs. However, without reasonable suspicion, any search would be unlawful and evidence obtained may be inadmissible in court.

How much does it cost to get legal advice about an unlawful police search in NSW?

Go To Court Lawyers offers a fixed consultation fee of $295 to discuss your unlawful search case. During this consultation, an experienced criminal lawyer will assess whether the police search was lawful, review the circumstances of your case, examine the evidence against you, and advise on your legal options. This upfront pricing ensures you know the cost before committing to legal advice.

How can a criminal lawyer help if I believe police conducted an unlawful search?

A criminal lawyer can challenge the admissibility of evidence obtained through unlawful searches, potentially having it excluded from court proceedings. They will analyse whether police had reasonable suspicion, examine if proper procedures were followed, and identify any breaches of your rights. Your lawyer can also negotiate with prosecutors, prepare your defence strategy, and represent you in court to achieve the best possible outcome.

Is there a time limit to challenge an unlawful police search in NSW?

Time limits depend on your specific circumstances and whether you've been charged with an offence. If criminal charges are pending, you should seek legal advice immediately as court dates and procedural deadlines apply. For civil action against police, limitation periods typically apply. Early legal intervention is crucial to preserve evidence, witness statements, and ensure all procedural requirements are met for challenging the search's lawfulness.