Need legal help with this matter?

Speak to a qualified local lawyer today. Free 24/7 hotline or book a consultation.

The right to silence is a fundamental common law right in all jurisdictions of Australia. In Queensland, the right to silence has been codified in Section 397 of the Police Powers and Responsibility Act (PPRA). That provision states that a person’s right to refuse to answer questions is protected, except where they are required to provide information under legislation. The right to silence is based on the principle that the prosecution bears the burden of proving a person guilty of an offence beyond a reasonable doubt and that an accused person therefore cannot be compelled to incriminate themselves. This article outlines the operation of the right to silence in Brisbane and the rest of Queensland.  

Case law and the right to silence 

In the 1991 decision of Petty & Maiden v The Queen, it was established that a court may not draw an adverse inference against an accused because they refused to give information to the police when asked to participate in an interview.

However, this rule does not extend to when an accused answers some of the questions during a police interview but refuses to answer others.

Legislation

Section 431 of the PPRA sets out the right of an accused person to silence as follows:

1. A police officer is required to caution a suspect prior to interviewing them;

2. The caution must be delivered in, or translated into, a language that the person is reasonably fluent in;

3. If the police officer suspects that the person does not understand, they may ask them to explain the caution in their own words.

4. If necessary, the police officer must explain the caution further.

A caution is a warning that the person does not have to answer any questions and that any information they do give may be used as evidence against them. The police must be certain that the person understands that they have the right to silence before proceeding to interview them. This may mean using an interpreter or asking them to repeat the caution in their own words to make sure they have understood it.

What if the police fail to caution a suspect?

If the police fail to caution a person before attempting to interview them or if they do not give the caution in a way the person understands, this can affect the admissibility of any evidence they give during the interview. When a person incriminates themselves after they were not properly cautioned, the defence will usually challenge the interview’s admissibility in a pre-trial proceeding known as a voir dire. 

During a voir dire, the court will hear evidence about how the interview was conducted. If the magistrate or judge considers that the police officers failed to adequately caution the suspect, it will exclude the interview from evidence so that the prosecution cannot adduce it. This is to ensure that police comply with the proper procedures and do not achieve a finding of guilt as a result of failing to uphold the rights of an accused person.

Exceptions to the right to silence in Brisbane

Under section 431(5) of the PPRA, there is an exception to the right to silence, which applies where someone is required to answer questions under legislation. One example of where a person is required to give information to the police is when police ask a person to provide their name and address. Under section 41, a person must provide police with their details in certain circumstances, like when police find them committing an offence or suspect on reasonable grounds that they have done so. Failure to provide a person’s name and address to police when asked to do so can amount to an offence

Should you exercise your right to silence in Brisbane?

At times it can be advisable to cooperate with the police when they suspect you of an offence as doing so can result in a more lenient penalty. However, it should be remembered that the right to silence is protected and that you cannot get into trouble as a result of refusing to exercise that right. The prosecution must ultimately prove an accused guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused does not have to prove that they are innocent.

If you require legal advice or representation in relation to the right to silence in Brisbane or in any other legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.

Free legal hotline — live now
Need a Criminal lawyer in QLD?

Speak to a qualified local lawyer now — free 24/7 hotline, no obligation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a court draw a negative inference if I refuse to answer some but not all police questions?

Yes, your silence may be used against you if you answer some questions but refuse others. The protection established in Petty and Maiden v The Queen only applies when a person refuses to participate in a police interview entirely. If you engage with questioning but selectively decline to answer certain questions, a court may draw an adverse inference from that selective silence. This is why obtaining legal advice before any police interview is strongly recommended.

How does the right to silence operate during a police interview at a Brisbane watch house?

At a Brisbane watch house, police must formally caution you before conducting an interview. This caution must be given in a language you reasonably understand, and if officers suspect you have not understood, they must ask you to explain it in your own words or clarify further. If an interpreter is needed, one must be provided. Any interview conducted without proper cautioning may result in evidence from that interview being deemed inadmissible in a Queensland court.

How much does it cost to get legal advice about my right to silence before a police interview?

Go To Court Lawyers offers an initial consultation for $295, during which a lawyer can advise you on your right to silence and how to handle a police interview. Getting legal advice before speaking to police is highly recommended, as anything you say can be used as evidence against you. Early legal guidance can significantly affect the outcome of your matter, and understanding your rights before an interview is one of the most important steps you can take.

What can a lawyer do to help me exercise my right to silence in Brisbane?

A lawyer can advise you on whether to participate in a police interview and what risks are associated with answering or refusing to answer questions. If you have already been interviewed without proper cautioning, a lawyer can challenge the admissibility of that evidence in court. They can also communicate with police on your behalf, attend the watch house, and ensure your rights under the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act are fully protected throughout the investigation and any subsequent proceedings.

Is there a time limit for challenging evidence obtained without a proper caution in Queensland?

Challenging improperly obtained evidence should be done as early as possible in your matter. In Queensland, applications to exclude such evidence are typically made during the pre-trial or committal stages of proceedings. Waiting too long to raise these issues can limit your options. If you believe police failed to properly caution you before an interview, you should contact a lawyer immediately so they can assess the circumstances and take steps to preserve your right to challenge that evidence.

Related Criminal topics in QLD

See all Criminal topics in QLD →