Call our lawyers
now
or,
have our lawyers
call you
Character Evidence (Vic)
Updated on Dec 08, 2022 • 3 min read • 887 views • Copy Link
Character Evidence (Vic)
Character evidence is evidence that relates to whether an accused is of good or bad character. Whether or not character evidence is admissible in a proceeding depends on whether the evidence is of good or bad character.
The rules of character evidence are set out in the Uniform Evidence Act, which codifies and in some respects alters the principles of common law and the provisions of the Crimes Act 1958.
Good character evidence
Good character evidence includes evidence of the accused’s general reputation and evidence of the accused’s favourable disposition. Evidence of good character may be relevant to give weight to the accused’s evidence (ie make it more likely the accused is telling the truth) or in order to make it less likely the accused is guilty of the offence.
Admissibility of good character evidence
The defence may adduce evidence of the accused’s good character (Section 110, Uniform Evidence Act). The evidence may be used to impute that the accused is a good person in general or in a particular respect.
Good character evidence can be opinion evidence from a witness about the character of the accused or evidence about the accused’s reputation in the community.
The weight that the court can give to character evidence will depend on a number of factors, including the strength of the other evidence supporting the charge, the nature of the offence charged and the relationship between the character established and the type of offence charged.
Bad character evidence
Evidence of the accused’s bad character is generally inadmissible as it is unfairly prejudicial.
There are three circumstances in which bad character can be admissible:
- Where evidence has been adduced to establish the accused’s good character, the prosecution or a co-accused can adduce evidence to contradict this;
- Where two or more people are charged as co-accused, expert evidence may be adduced by one party as to the character of a co-accused (Section 111, Uniform Evidence Act).
- Where evidence of bad character is admissible under Part 3.7 of the Evidence Act, as evidence pertaining to the credibility of a witness.
If the prosecution wishes to cross-examine an accused about matters arising out of character evidence, it requires the leave of the court (Section 112, Uniform Evidence Act).
Use of bad character evidence
Bad character evidence can only be used to contradict good character evidence. It cannot be used to to establish guilt. The court can limit the use of bad character evidence if it risks being unfairly prejudicial for a party or if it is likely to be misleading or confusing for the jury.
Bad character evidence cannot be used to impute that the accused has a propensity to behave in a way that makes it likely they committed the offence. In this way, bad character evidence cannot be used in the same way as good character evidence, which can be used for a sort of propensity reasoning in establishing that the accused would have been unlikely to have committed the offence.
Evidence is not inadmissible simply because it shows the bad character of the accused, if it is adduced for another purpose. Such evidence may be admitted, but the jury must be warned that it should not be used for an irrelevant or prejudicial purpose.
If you require legal advice or representation in a criminal law matter or in any other legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Related Content
Who Has Criminal Liability? (Vic)
Court Etiquette in Victoria
Drug Offences in Victoria
Ticket Scalping (Vic)
Applying For Bail in the Children’s Court of Victoria (Vic)
Verdins Principles: Mental Illness and Sentencing (Vic)
Important Changes to the Infringement System (Vic)
Evidence of Admissions (Vic)
Offences Involving Underage Drinking (Vic)
Common Assault in Victoria
Fingerprints and the Law (Vic)
Use of Listening Devices in Victoria
Fernanda Dahlstrom
Content Editor
Fernanda Dahlstrom has a Bachelor of Laws from Latrobe University, a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice from the College of Law, a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Melbourne and a Master of Arts (Writing and Literature) from Deakin University. Fernanda practised law for eight years, working in criminal defence, child protection and domestic violence law in the Northern Territory. She also practised in family law after moving to Brisbane in 2016.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
Oaths and Affirmations (WA) In Western Australia, a person will be required to take an oath or make an affirmation when they are signing an affidavit or when they are to give evidence in court. Oaths and Affirmations in WA are governed by the Oaths, Affidavits and Statutory Declarations Act ....
Posted in:
Evidence
In Tasmania, people have a common law and legislative right to remain silent when they are suspected of a crime. This means that, except in limited circumstances, a suspect can decline to answer questions when interviewed by police. It also means that a defendant can choose not to self-incriminate during ....
Posted in:
Evidence
Police Procedures
Child Forensic Interviews: The Queen v Brown
Child Forensic Interviews: The Queen v Brown The 2020 NT Supreme Court decision of The Queen v Brown dealt with the question of whether the content of three Child Forensic Interviews conducted in the court of an investigation of a child sex matter was admissible at trial. In that matter, ....
Posted in:
Evidence
Police Procedures
A person who is charged with criminal offences may contest the charge and rely on a legal defence such as self-defence or duress. An accused person may also rely on a factual defence such as an alibi. An alibi exists where a person was not at the scene of the ....
Posted in:
Defences
Evidence
The Hearsay Rule (Qld) The hearsay rule is one of the most fundamental and best-known rules of evidence. At common law, the rule is that evidence of a statement made by another person is not admissible in order to establish the truth of the statement. In Queensland, the rules regarding ....
Posted in:
Evidence
One of the most important rules of evidence when it comes to cross-examination is known as the Browne v Dunn rule. This rule was established in the 1893 English Court of Appeal decision of Browne v Dunn. The rule applies both in criminal and civil proceedings. Essentially the Browne v ....
Posted in:
Evidence
Voir Dires (Tas) A voir dire is a pre-trial procedure that is held when one party objects to evidence that the other party seeks to adduce. Its purpose is to decide whether the evidence ought to be admitted. The court makes this decision after hearing evidence and submissions from both ....
Posted in:
Evidence
A voir dire is a pre-trial procedure used to determine the admissibility of particular evidence. It occurs when one party challenges the admissibility of evidence the other party proposes to adduce. A voir dire consists of the court making findings of fact and applying the law after hearing evidence and ....
Posted in:
Court Processes
Evidence
Alibis (ACT) When a person is charged with a criminal offence, they may contest the charge by advancing a legal defence such as self-defence or by relying on a factual defence such as an alibi. An alibi exists where an accused was not at the scene of the alleged offence ....
Posted in:
Evidence
Brief of Evidence (WA) When a person is charged with criminal offences in Western Australia, they have to decide whether to plead guilty and accept a sentence or to plead not guilty and proceed to trial or contested hearing. Prior to making this decision, the accused may want to obtain ....
Posted in:
Court Processes
Evidence
A person accused or suspected of a crime in Tasmania can rely on an alibi. An alibi is a factual defence, based on a claim that the accused was somewhere else at the time that the crime took place. Another person can support an accused person’s alibi by saying that ....
Posted in:
Defences
Evidence
Cross-examination and Re-examination (NSW)
Cross-examination and Re-examination (NSW) When a party to a criminal matter calls a witness to give evidence, the witness gives their evidence in the form of examination-in-chief. The witness is usually then cross-examined by the other party and may then be re-examined by the party that called them. This page ....
Posted in:
Evidence