Tree Disputes in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT)
Tree Disputes in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT)
Tree disputes sometimes arise between neighbours when a tree on one property starts to affect a neighbouring property. They can also arise between the government and private individuals when a tree that is on council land causes damage to private property. This article deals with tree disputes in the ACT.
Avoiding tree disputes
Tree disputes can be avoided by making sure you are familiar with your responsibilities with respect to the trees on your property, selecting new trees that are appropriate to your environment and maintaining them
If a neighbour’s tree is affecting you or your land, it is always best to try to resolve the situation directly with them.
If you are unable to resolve a tree dispute directly with your neighbour, you may want to consider inviting them to mediation at a Dispute Resolution Centre.
Protected trees
Many Canberra trees are registered or regulated under the Tree Protection Act 2005.
Trees can be registered if they meet the criteria for registration based on their contribution to the area’s natural or cultural heritage value, its landscape and aesthetic value or its scientific value.
Regulated trees are trees more than 12m tall, trees that have a trunk circumference of more than 1.5m, or that have a canopy of over 12m wide.
A protected tree must not be removed or cut without approval. If a person is contemplating work that may result in damage to a protected tree, they can lodge an application to undertake a tree damaging activity with Access Canberra.
Damage caused by government trees
When a tree that is on public property causes damage to private property, the owner may be able to claim reimbursement from the ACT government. A person is likely to be successful in their claim where it can be shown that the damage resulted from negligence by the ACT government. Where the damage is the result of an accident or an unforeseeable incident, the government will not accept responsibility.
If a person believes that damage has been caused to their property by a government tree, they should immediately notify Access Canberra. The circumstances of the damage will then be investigated and assessed.
Overhanging branches
A person is entitled to trim overhanding branches of a tree on an adjoining property providing the tree is not protected. A person must do this from their own property unless the neighbour has given them permission to enter their property.
Tree nuisance
If a tree causes an unreasonable interference with a neighbour’s use or enjoyment of their land, the tree-keeper could be liable for nuisance. A person can make a civil dispute application to the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal (ACAT) in respect of a neighbour’s tree seeking a nuisance order.
Tree trespass
If a tree is encroaching onto a neighbour’s property it is trespassing. A person in this situation can apply to CAT for a trespass order.
ACAT determinations
To initiate a civil claim in ACAT, a person needs to complete a civil dispute application and lodge it with the tribunal together with any supporting documents. A fee is also payable unless the applicant is exempt on the basis of financial hardship. ACAT will then serve the application on the respondent, who must then lodge a response form indicating whether they agree with the claim or dispute it.
If a matter is scheduled for a hearing, both parties must attend and bring all the documents and information required and tell the tribunal what order they want it to make. If the tribunal is satisfied that the tree in question is trespassing or causing a nuisance, it will make orders to rectify the situation.
Appeals
If a person believes an ACAT decision was wrong, it may appeal to the Appeals Tribunal within 28 days of the ACAT decision. A decision of the Appeals Tribunal can be appeals to the ACT supreme Court.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Fernanda Dahlstrom
Content Editor
Fernanda Dahlstrom has a Bachelor of Laws from Latrobe University, a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice from the College of Law, a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Melbourne and a Master of Arts (Writing and Literature) from Deakin University. Fernanda practised law for eight years, working in criminal defence, child protection and domestic violence law in the Northern Territory. She also practised in family law after moving to Brisbane in 2016.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
Social Media and Defamation Social media platforms like Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) have revolutionised communication, enabling people to immediately share experiences, news, and opinions with a global audience. While social media platforms are powerful tools of communication, these tools should not be used to spread unverified and harmful information. ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Qld)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Qld) Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an umbrella term for a variety of means of assisting people and organisations to settle a legal dispute without having to go to court. ADR includes mediation, conciliation, and arbitration and can be used in most types of disputes, including civil ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Administrative Review in South Australia
Administrative Review in South Australia In South Australia, the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT) reviews decisions made by state government departments and agencies and decides whether the decision was the right decision. This type of administrative review is known as merits review. Government decisions may also be reviewed by the South ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Victoria
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Victoria Alternative dispute resolution is a range of processes used to try to resolve a disagreement without bringing it to court. In many types of civil and family law matters, a party is required to attempt to resolve the dispute through alternative dispute resolution the court ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Legal Professional Negligence (WA)
A person can be found guilty of the tort of negligence in a range of contexts. Any person who does something that could affect someone else has a duty of care to the other person. The level of care owed to the other person depends on the situation. Negligence can ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Defamation in Western Australia
Defamation in Western Australia Defamation in Western Australia is a civil action, known as a tort. It is broadly defined as the publication of unsubstantiated facts that hurt an individual’s reputation or suggest that someone should be shunned, avoided, hated, ridiculed, or treated with contempt. Defamation was developed in the ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Administrative review is the review by a court or tribunal of a decision made by a government department or agency. It can occur in a range of contexts at both federal and state/territory level. This page deals with administrative review in the NT. Merits review vs judicial review There are ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Throughout the English-speaking legal world, natural disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis are referred to as acts of God. Acts of God are circumstances that are outside of anyone’s control and that could not be foreseen or guarded against. Acts of God may provide a defence or an exception to ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Racial Vilification and Section 18C
Racial Vilification and Section 18C The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race in a variety of contexts. In 1995, a controversial provision was introduced into the Act, making it unlawful to do an act in public that is likely to offend, insult or humiliate a person or ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Administrative Review (WA) Administrative review is the review by a court or tribunal of a decision made by a government department or agency. Administrative review can occur at a state or at a federal level. This page deals with administrative review in Western Australia. Merits review vs judicial review Administrative ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Nuisance (Qld) Nuisance can be a criminal offence (public nuisance). It can also be a civil issue (private nuisance), which can become the subject of a complaint to a local council. This page deals with nuisance in Queensland. Public nuisance The offence of public nuisance in Queensland is governed by the Summary Offences ....
Posted in:
Disputes
Torts are civil wrongs done by one party to another. A tort causes a person to suffer loss or harm. A person who is the claimant in a tort may sue for damages or other relief. Torts are generally created by the common law but there are also statutory wrongs ....
Posted in:
Disputes