Consumer Claims in ACT
The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) applies to all consumer transactions entered into in the ACT after 1 January 2011 and is set out in Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. This is because the ACT Fair Trading (Australian Consumer Law) Act 1992 extends the application of the ACL to transactions that have a connection with the ACT. Consumer transactions that were entered into before 1 January 2011 remain covered by the Fair Trading Consumer Affairs) Act 1973 and the Fair Trading Act 1992. This article deals with consumer claims in the ACT.
The Australian Consumer Law
The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (and therefore the ACL) was enacted by the Commonwealth government and for constitutional reasons applies to constitutional corporations. All states and territories enacted legislation to incorporate the provisions of the ACL into their law so that it applies to all consumer transactions. This reduces the number of laws and obligations that must be complied with by businesses operating throughout Australia as they now have the same fair trading obligations where ever they are.
The ACL covers unfair contract terms in standard form consumer contracts and also sets out the rules that cover unsolicited consumer agreements for telephone and door-to-door sales and lay-by agreements. It guarantees certain consumer rights when buying goods and services overseas, and a national product safety law and enforcement system which includes options for penalties and consumer redress.
Fair Trading
In the ACT the Australian Consumer Law is enforced by Fair Trading, which is part of Access Canberra. Fair Trading is comprised of Compliance and Enforcement Officers and the Advice and Complaints team and has responsibility for enforcing a wide range of legislation. This is done by identifying and investigating breaches of legislation, providing education programs, advising of licensees and traders, and the provision of advice and information to consumers and dealing with their complaints.
Fair Trading can deal with disputes concerning motor vehicles, fitness and gym services and memberships, renovating and building, the sale or purchase of property, problems with owners corporations, retirement villages, frauds and scams, product safety issues, licensed premises, security services and smoking in enclosed public places and outdoor cafés. It has jurisdiction in respect of complaints or claims by any consumer who resides in the ACT (no matter where the business is) or in disputes with a motor vehicle seller or repairer that operates in the ACT that is made by consumers living outside of the ACT.
There is a telephone enquiry line or email service available to provide information and advice on how to resolve a dispute and information regarding the rights and obligations of consumers and businesses
Settling disputes in the first instance
The trader who sold a product must attempt to help to resolve the dispute with the consumer. If it can’t be resolved, the ORS can attempt to conciliate the dispute. They will speak to the business, identify the issues in a dispute and look for options for a resolution. If a resolution can’t be found, ORS will provide other options for the consumer. These options could include taking the complaint to a court or a consumer industry complaint tribunal.
The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear complaints regarding the provision of goods and services, which may include recovery of the value of goods or recovery of goods. ORS Fair Trading will prioritise the claims of non-compliance and complaints received so that the most critical complaints are the first to be investigated. This may mean that limited action is taken on a complaint that is considered to be a low priority
Enforcement and remedies
There are various options open to resolve breaches of the ACL. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission can declare that a term in a standard form consumer contract is unfair and therefore can’t be enforced. If a trader thinks that they may have contravened the Act, they can offer the regulator an undertaking that they will put a system in place to ensure it doesn’t happen again. If it is accepted, the undertaking will be enforceable by a court.
A regulator can also send a notice to a business seeking information about representations or claims they have made to determine whether any further investigation is required. If the trader does not reply to the notice, or if a regulator considers that the trader has contravened the Act, the regulator can then ask the court to authorise a public warning notice.
A regulator can also ask a court to make an order to redress any harm suffered in the community as a result of a breach, for the issue of an adverse publicity order against a trader, or for an order disqualifying a particular person or person from managing a corporation. On the application of either a regulator or an affected consumer, the court can issue an injunction to stop a business from behaving in a way that breaches the Act. If the actions of a trader cause damage or loss to a consumer then either the consumer or a regulator can apply to the court to recover damages, refunds or compensation.
The ACL creates penalties for breaches of certain provisions of the Act with penalties that include orders for compensation, fines and criminal convictions.
Speak to A Civil Law Expert Today
Civil law encompasses a wide variety of legal issues. Go To Court has many experienced civil lawyers across the country who have expertise in all areas of civil law. We can assist you with debt recovery due to an unpaid loan or invoice; employment issues, such as unfair dismissal, or bullying and harassment in the workplace; commercial and residential leasing disputes; contractual disputes; insolvency and bankruptcy; and commercial litigation. No matter how big or small your matter is our civil lawyers are here to help.
It is important to determine which court or tribunal your matter should be heard in. Each state has different jurisdictions and requirements that need to be met. It is often difficult to know where the cause of action arose, and where proceedings should be commenced. Our Australia-wide network of civil lawyers can help you determine the best way forward no matter where the dispute arose.
Commencing proceedings isn’t always the best way to proceed, and our Go To Court civil lawyers are experienced in mediation and dispute resolution to assist you to achieve a quick and cost-effective outcome, where possible.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
