National Legal Hotline

7am to midnight, 7 days

Call our lawyers NOW or,
have our lawyers CALL YOU

Defamation in the ACT

The laws of defamation in the ACT aim to find a balance between freedom of expression and the protection of reputation.

Defamation in the Australian Capital Territory

What is defamation in the ACT?

Defamation is where a false statement is communicated to a third party, causing injury to the reputation of the person about whom the statement is made.

In 2006, the ACT, along with the other states and territories of Australia, implemented Uniform Defamation Laws to their Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (the Act) to create consistency throughout Australia when dealing with defamation claims.

‘Libel’ and ‘slander’ – what is the difference?

Prior to the revision of the Act, ‘libel’ and ‘slander’ were two distinct forms of defamation.

‘Slander’ was a spoken statement which was false and which damaged a person’s reputation. In contrast, ‘libel’ was a false statement which damaged the person’s reputation, and which was published in print.

The new laws of defamation in the ACT abolished the distinction between these two forms of defamation, meaning it is no longer necessary to make separate claims when the false statement was spoken and in print.

The law of defamation in the ACT

In the ACT, defamation falls under the common law of torts, a civil action regulated by the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002.

For a claim of defamation in the ACT to succeed:

  • The statement in question must have been published or communicated to a third party – publication or communication of the false statement can be spoken, written, or in some cases, drawn.
  • The statement must have identified the person bringing the claim – the statement must be about the individual making the claim. Corporations cannot bring an action for defamation unless they are either a not-for-profit company or employ fewer than 10 people.
  • The statement was defamatory, causing injury or loss to the person’s reputation – the test the courts use to decide whether the statement is defamatory is whether it harms or lessens the person’s reputation, ridicules the person, or causes other people to shun or avoid them.
  • There is no defence available for making the statement – a claim of defamation in the ACT will not succeed if the publisher can raise a successful defence.


There are a number of defences available against claims of defamation including:

  • justification – the statement is substantially true
  • contextual truth – the statement contains false elements but they do not further harm the person’s reputation.
  • absolute privilege – published during parliamentary proceedings or proceedings in any Australian court or tribunal.
  • publication of public documents – any statement found in a document published by parliament or a court of law.
  • fair report of proceedings of public concern – the statement was previously published in a report regarding the proceedings of governments, courts, tribunals or another official body.
  • qualified privilege – where the recipient of the defamatory statement has an interest in having the information, and the statement was only published when the information was passed to the recipient.
  • honest opinion – the statement is made as opinion, rather than a statement of fact. The opinion must be of public interest and based on proper material.
  • innocent dissemination – the statement is made by an agent or employee and they were not aware the statement was false.
  • triviality – the statement is trivial and unlikely to cause any harm.


Defamation in the ACT is a civil law action, so compensation is normally monetary in nature. Damages will only be awarded for loss, not as punishment of the person who made the defamatory statement.

When awarding damages the court will calculate an amount that is proportionate to the harm caused.

The most that can be awarded for non-economic loss is $250,000, unless the court feels the circumstances warrant a larger sum.

In calculating the damages, the court can consider mitigating factors, such as:

  • an apology
  • publication of a correction
  • damages or compensation already paid in relation to another publication of the same or a similar defamatory statement.


It is important to consider any offer made to settle the matter out of court. If you reject an offer to settle and are subsequently unsuccessful in court, you may be required to pay the legal costs of the other party.

Court procedure

Where the matter will be heard is primarily determined by the place in which the statement was published. If the statement is only published in one location, the matter will be heard locally.

Where a defamation case concerns statements published Australia-wide, proceedings will be brought in the location which has the closest connection to the publication. To determine which locality has the closest connection, the court will consider:

  • where the defamed person resides
  • where the statement has been published
  • how much harm to the person’s reputation has occurred in each location in which the statement has been published.

This article reflects the state of the law as at 1 February 2016. It is intended to be of a general nature only and does not constitute legal advice. If you require legal assistance, please telephone 1300 636 846 or request a consultation at


Michelle Makela

Michelle Makela is one of our Legal Practice Directors and the National Practice Manager. She holds a Bachelor of Laws, a Bachelor of Science (Psychology) and a Master’s in Criminology. Michelle has had a varied career, working in commercial litigation, criminal law, family law and estate planning. Michelle joined Go To Court Lawyers in 2011. She now supervises a team of over 80 solicitors across Australia.

Call our lawyers NOW or,
have our lawyers CALL YOU

1300 636 846

7am to midnight, 7 days

Legal Hotline - Call Now 7am to midnight, 7 days