Call our lawyers
now
or,
have our lawyers
call you
The Defence of Insanity (Qld)
Updated on Nov 09, 2022 • 4 min read • 603 views • Copy Link
The Defence of Insanity (Qld)
A person has a full legal defence to any criminal charge if at the time of the alleged offence they were suffering from a mental disease or impairment that prevented them from understanding or controlling their actions. In Queensland, this defence is set out in section 27 of the Criminal Code. This page deals with the defence of insanity in Queensland.
Legislation
Under section 27 of the Criminal Code 1899, a person is not criminally responsible for an act or omission if at the time they were affected by a mental disease or mental infirmity that meant that they:
- Could not control their actions;
- Coud not understand what they were doing; or
- Could not understand that they ought not to do the act or make the omission.
Mental Health Court
Where a person is facing a serious charge on indictment and is relying on the defence on insanity, their matter will be decided by the Mental Health Court. The Mental Health Court consists of a Supreme Court judge and two clinicians.
If a person is facing charges in the Magistrates Court or Children’s Court and raised insanity, their matter will remain before a magistrate.
Burden
If the defence relies on the defence of insanity, it is up to the accused to satisfy the court that they were not of sound mind at the time of the alleged offence. This must be proven on the balance of probabilities.
What is a mental disease or infirmity?
A mental disease is a disease that affects the functions of the mind like the ability to reason or remember. This may be a mental illness, brain damage, intellectual disability or a temporary disordering of the mind such as concussion.
If the accused establishes that they were suffering from a disease of the mind at the time of the alleged offence, they must then establish that the disease of the mind meant that they were unable to control or understand their actions or to recognise that what they were doing would be considered wrong by ordinary people.
Expert evidence
Expert evidence may be adduced by the defence or prosecution when a defence of insanity is being pursued. Expert witnesses may give evidence as to whether the accused was insane at the time of the alleged offence.
However, the court must decide whether the defence of insanity succeeds based on all the evidence before it and based on all the circumstances surrounding the alleged offence. This means that the opinion of the expert witnesses will not necessarily be determinative. The jury is not obliged to accept the evidence given by the expert.
Qualified acquittal
If a person is found not guilty of an offence on the basis of insanity, this is a qualified acquittal. The person will then be dealt with under the Mental Health Act 2016.
Under the Mental Health Act, a person who has been found not guilty because of insanity may be made subject to a Forensic Order or a Treatment Support Order.
A Forensic Order will be made if the court considers it necessary to protect the community from the risk of serious harm. A person on a Forensic Order may be subjected to involuntary treatment and care and may be detained in an authorised mental health service or in the Forensic Disability Service. The order will be subject to regular review by the Mental Health Court.
A Treatment Support Order is made to protect the community in a situation where a Forensic Order is not necessary. A person on a Treatment Support Order is generally living in the community, unless there is some reason that they need to be an inpatient.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Related Content
Domestic Violence Matters (Qld)
Release Without Penalty (Qld)
Amendment to the Youth Justice Act (Qld)
Youth Diversion (Qld)
Sentencing Purposes (Qld)
Mandatory Sentencing (Qld)
Sentencing and Young People (Qld)
Oaths and Affirmations (Qld)
Citizen’s Arrests (Qld)
Concurrent and Cumulative Sentences (Qld)
Habitually Consorting With Offenders (Qld)
Escape From Custody (Qld)
Fernanda Dahlstrom
Content Editor
Fernanda Dahlstrom has a Bachelor of Laws from Latrobe University, a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice from the College of Law, a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Melbourne and a Master of Arts (Writing and Literature) from Deakin University. Fernanda practised law for eight years, working in criminal defence, child protection and domestic violence law in the Northern Territory. She also practised in family law after moving to Brisbane in 2016.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
Provocation in Victoria Provocation was abolished as a partial defence to murder in Victoria in 2005. Prior to that year, provocation could be used to reduce a conviction of murder to one of manslaughter. Provocation in Victoria no longer amounts to a partial defence. However, any provocative conduct by a ....
Posted in:
Defences
Sentencing
The Defence of Automatism - Unwilled Acts in Queensland (QLD)
Automatism is a well-established defence to a range of criminal offences. Automatism is defined in the common law as ‘action without conscious volition’ and refers to a person’s conduct of which they are not conscious, and which is done as a series of unwilled acts. This defence is based on ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defence of Self-Defence This page deals with the criminal defence of self-defence, which can be invoked by an accused person who uses force in response to a perceived threat of harm. Self-defence allows an accused person to assert that their actions were warranted because they were protecting themselves, another person, ....
Posted in:
Defences
Common Purpose (NT) Under NT criminal law, a person may be charged with criminal offences even where they did not commit the physical elements of the offence. This can happen via the doctrine of common purpose or where a person has been an accessory before or after the fact. This ....
Posted in:
Defences
Criminal Defences in Queensland
Most criminal defences in Queensland are set out in the Queensland Criminal Code 1899. Defences in criminal cases work in a very particular way. In criminal cases the prosecution has to prove all of the elements of a particular offence beyond reasonable doubt. If the prosecution fails to prove one ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Lawful Correction
The Defence of Lawful Correction The defence of lawful correction, also known as reasonable chastisement or discipline of children, exists in all Australian jurisdictions. Parents and those acting in a parental capacity may use reasonable force to discipline a child, and if they are charged with a criminal offence, they ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Automatism (WA)
The Defence of Automatism (WA) Automatism refers to the involuntary conduct of a person caused by the lack of conscious volition. It includes actions or conduct such as: Sleepwalking; Episodes of epilepsy; Dissociation caused by physical trauma such as a blow to the head, resulting in severe concussion; Drug-induced psychosis; ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
In order for an accused to be found guilty and convicted of a crime in NSW, the prosecution must be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person’s conduct was voluntary. Where a criminal act is committed in a state of automatism, this means that the offence was ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Self-Defence (Qld)
In Queensland the law permits a person to use reasonable force to physically defend themselves, another person or their property. The defence of self-defence requires the person to have acted in a way that was reasonable in the circumstances and for the defensive conduct to have been proportionate to the ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Age of Criminal Liability (NSW)
In all Australian jurisdictions, the age of criminal liability is 10. This means that no child below the age of 10 can be arrested, summonsed or found guilty of a criminal offence. In New South Wales, this rule is contained in Section 5 of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987. ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Provocation (NSW)
In New South Wales, extreme provocation can be used as a ‘partial defence’ to a charge of murder. If a person charged with murder was acting in response to extreme provocation, he or she will be found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder (Crimes Act 1900, Section 23(1)). The defence of provocation ....
Posted in:
Defences
Duress is a full defence to most criminal charges. An accused can be acquitted on the basis of duress if they were essentially ‘forced’ into committing the acts that make up the criminal offence. The defence of duress is based on the principle that a person should not be held ....
Posted in:
Defences