The Defence of Insanity (Qld)
The Defence of Insanity (Qld)
A person has a full legal defence to any criminal charge if at the time of the alleged offence they were suffering from a mental disease or impairment that prevented them from understanding or controlling their actions. In Queensland, this defence is set out in section 27 of the Criminal Code. This page deals with the defence of insanity in Queensland.
Legislation
Under section 27 of the Criminal Code 1899, a person is not criminally responsible for an act or omission if at the time they were affected by a mental disease or mental infirmity that meant that they:
- Could not control their actions;
- Coud not understand what they were doing; or
- Could not understand that they ought not to do the act or make the omission.
Mental Health Court
Where a person is facing a serious charge on indictment and is relying on the defence on insanity, their matter will be decided by the Mental Health Court. The Mental Health Court consists of a Supreme Court judge and two clinicians.
If a person is facing charges in the Magistrates Court or Children’s Court and raised insanity, their matter will remain before a magistrate.
Burden
If the defence relies on the defence of insanity, it is up to the accused to satisfy the court that they were not of sound mind at the time of the alleged offence. This must be proven on the balance of probabilities.
What is a mental disease or infirmity?
A mental disease is a disease that affects the functions of the mind like the ability to reason or remember. This may be a mental illness, brain damage, intellectual disability or a temporary disordering of the mind such as concussion.
If the accused establishes that they were suffering from a disease of the mind at the time of the alleged offence, they must then establish that the disease of the mind meant that they were unable to control or understand their actions or to recognise that what they were doing would be considered wrong by ordinary people.
Expert evidence
Expert evidence may be adduced by the defence or prosecution when a defence of insanity is being pursued. Expert witnesses may give evidence as to whether the accused was insane at the time of the alleged offence.
However, the court must decide whether the defence of insanity succeeds based on all the evidence before it and based on all the circumstances surrounding the alleged offence. This means that the opinion of the expert witnesses will not necessarily be determinative. The jury is not obliged to accept the evidence given by the expert.
Qualified acquittal
If a person is found not guilty of an offence on the basis of insanity, this is a qualified acquittal. The person will then be dealt with under the Mental Health Act 2016.
Under the Mental Health Act, a person who has been found not guilty because of insanity may be made subject to a Forensic Order or a Treatment Support Order.
A Forensic Order will be made if the court considers it necessary to protect the community from the risk of serious harm. A person on a Forensic Order may be subjected to involuntary treatment and care and may be detained in an authorised mental health service or in the Forensic Disability Service. The order will be subject to regular review by the Mental Health Court.
A Treatment Support Order is made to protect the community in a situation where a Forensic Order is not necessary. A person on a Treatment Support Order is generally living in the community, unless there is some reason that they need to be an inpatient.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Related Content
Fernanda Dahlstrom
Content Editor
Fernanda Dahlstrom has a Bachelor of Laws from Latrobe University, a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice from the College of Law, a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Melbourne and a Master of Arts (Writing and Literature) from Deakin University. Fernanda practised law for eight years, working in criminal defence, child protection and domestic violence law in the Northern Territory. She also practised in family law after moving to Brisbane in 2016.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
Is Intoxication a Defence? (NT)
Is Intoxication a Defence? (NT) Lawyers are often asked whether intoxication can be used as a defence to criminal offences. Under NT law, courts can take the intoxication of an accused person into account in a number of ways when determining whether they are guilty of an offence. However, self-induced ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defence of Self-Defence This page deals with the criminal defence of self-defence, which can be invoked by an accused person who uses force in response to a perceived threat of harm. Self-defence allows an accused person to assert that their actions were warranted because they were protecting themselves, another person, ....
Posted in:
Defences
Age of Criminal Liability in Brisbane
Age of Criminal Liability in Brisbane The minimum age of criminal liability is the age at which a person can be arrested or summonsed for, charged with and found guilty of a criminal offence. The age of criminal liability in Brisbane and the rest of Queensland is currently 10. This ....
Posted in:
Defences
Honest and Reasonable Mistake of Fact
Honest and Reasonable Mistake of Fact In Australia, there are three types of criminal offences and these are mens rea offences, absolute liability offences and strict liability offences. The defence of honest and reasonable mistake of fact is a legal defence to any strict liability offence. In order to examine ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Honest and Reasonable Mistake (Qld)
Honest and Reasonable Mistake Defence (Qld) Certain criminal offences fall under the category of ‘strict liability offences.’ These are offences for which the prosecution is not required to prove that the accused had an intention to commit the crime. In other words, a strict liability offence does not have a ....
Posted in:
Defences
Mental Impairment Defence in Victorian Criminal Law
Mental Impairment Defence in Victorian Criminal Law A fundamental principle of the criminal justice system is that a person is held accountable for acts that they committed voluntarily. When a person is mentally impaired, this can amount to a defence to a criminal charge on the basis that the person ....
Posted in:
Defences
Provocation in Victoria Provocation was abolished as a partial defence to murder in Victoria in 2005. Prior to that year, provocation could be used to reduce a conviction of murder to one of manslaughter. Provocation in Victoria no longer amounts to a partial defence. However, any provocative conduct by a ....
Posted in:
Defences
Sentencing
Mistake of Fact in Tasmania Mistake of fact is a criminal defence that can be relied on when a person is charged with an offence that does not require a specific mental state such as intention or recklessness. Mistake of fact in Tasmania is codified in section 14 of the ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Mental Impairment (ACT)
The Defence of Mental Impairment (ACT) In the ACT, a person who is charged with offences can rely on the defence of mental impairment. This defence is contained in sections 28 and 29 of the Criminal Code 2002. Mental impairment provides a full defence to any criminal charge because of ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defence of Similar Age The defence of similar age can be applied to certain offences involving sexual contact with a child in most Australian jurisdictions. The defence applies when consensual sex occurs between two young people who are of a similar age. There is considerable variation between different states and ....
Posted in:
Defences
Automatism is a well-established defence to all criminal offences. While it has been successfully argued even in relation to very serious crimes, its application remains controversial. The defence of automatism is based on the principle that a person cannot be held responsible under the criminal law for an act which was ....
Posted in:
Defences
Sudden or Extraordinary Emergency (ACT)
Sudden or Extraordinary Emergency (ACT) The defence of emergency in the ACT allows a person to be excused from criminal liability if they committed an offense in response to sudden or extraordinary emergency circumstances. This defence is contained section 41 of the Criminal Code 2002 and section 10.3 of the ....
Posted in:
Defences