Need a Criminal Law lawyer in SA?
Speak to a qualified local lawyer today. Free 24/7 hotline or book a $295 consultation.
This article was prepared by Go To Court Lawyers, Australia's largest legal service. For legal advice specific to your situation, call 1300 636 846.
Theft is one of the most common property offences. In South Australia, it has been codified in section 134 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1934. There are also other property offences which involve stealing in South Australia, such as robbery, which is made up of theft as well as the use or threat of violence. This article deals with theft in South Australia.
Theft in South Australia
The simple offence of theft under section 134 occurs when a person dishonestly deals with property without the owner’s consent with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of the property or to seriously encroach on their property rights. A person seriously encroaches on another’s property rights if they:
- Treat the property as their own regardless of the other person’s rights;
- Deal with the property in a way that means the owner may not get it back or that when they get it back, it may be worth a lot less.
It is possible to steal property that has come into your possession lawfully. It is also possible to steal by misusing your powers as a trustee or agent.
Theft is punishable by a maximum of 10 years imprisonment for a basic offence, or 15 years imprisonment for an aggravated offence.
Defences to theft
A person charged with theft may rely on a legal or a factual defence. Legal defences to stealing in South Australia include the following.
Lawful claim of right
A person is not guilty of theft if they had a lawful claim to the item allegedly stolen. For example, if a person takes back an item they have leant to another person without the other person’s permission, they are not guilty of theft.
Mistake of fact
A person is not guilty of theft if the alleged offence came about because of an honest and reasonable mistake of fact. For example, if a person mistakenly believed they had paid for an item before leaving the store with it, they would not be guilty of theft.
No intention to permanently deprive
A person is not guilty of theft if they take an item belonging to someone else with the intention of returning it.
Shop theft
In South Australia, the Shop Theft (Alternative Enforcement) Act 2000 deals with minor instances of shoplifting. Under that act, a person can be dealt with by way of an infringement notice for shoplifting, provided they take various other steps to take responsibility for their offending. The act sets up an alternative method for dealing with theft when it occurs in the form of shoplifting. This allows these offenders to be kept out of the court system while still being held accountable for their actions.
A person may be dealt with under the Shop Theft (Alternative Enforcement) Act 2000 if they consent to this. If the person does not consent to being dealt with in this way, they may be charged with theft.
The steps a person will be required to take to address their offending under this act depend on the value of the item/s stolen.
Where the item is worth $150 or less, a person may be dealt with by an infringement notice provided they apologise to the shopkeeper The person will also be required to sign a notice admitting the offence and agreeing to receive a caution from police. The police must also confirm it is appropriate for the matter to be dealt with in this way.
Where the item is worth more than $150, a person may be dealt with by an infringement notice if they apologise to the shopkeeper, pay for the item if it is no longer in the condition it was displayed for sale in, sign a notice admitting the offence and agreeing to receive a caution from the police, and to complete a period of community service of one hour for every $5 of the value of the item stolen. The police must also confirm it is appropriate for the matter to be dealt with in this way.
Other offences related to stealing in South Australia
There are several other offences contained in the Criminal Law Consolidation Act that are related to the offence of stealing.
Robbery
Under section 137, a person is guilty of robbery if they use or threaten to use force in order to commit a theft or uses or threaten to use force to escape the scene of a theft. This offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment for a basic offence or life imprisonment for an aggravated offence.
An offence is aggravated if it is committed under any of the circumstances set out in section 5AA. These include the use of a weapon, the fact the victim was under 14 or over 60 and where the victim was a police officer or corrections officer.
Making off without payment
Under section 144, a person is guilty of an offence if they dishonestly make off with the intention of avoiding paying for goods or services. This is punishable by up to two years imprisonment.
Identity theft
Part 5A of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act contains offences related specifically to identity theft. These include assuming a false identity, misusing a PIN number and producing prohibited material for a criminal purpose.
If you require legal advice or representation in any legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
faqs: - question: 'What is the difference between theft and aggravated theft penalties in South Australia?' answer: 'Basic theft carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, while aggravated theft carries a maximum of 15 years imprisonment in South Australia. The aggravated form typically involves circumstances that make the offence more serious, such as the value of stolen property or specific circumstances surrounding the theft. Both offences are prosecuted under section 134 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 and can result in serious criminal records affecting future employment and travel opportunities.' - question: 'How does South Australia''s Criminal Law Consolidation Act define dishonest dealing with property?' answer: 'Under South Australian law, dishonest dealing occurs when someone takes property without the owner''s consent, intending to permanently deprive the owner or seriously encroach on their property rights. This includes treating property as your own regardless of the owner''s rights, or dealing with it so the owner may not recover it or receives it back with significantly diminished value. The dishonesty element is assessed objectively by community standards of what constitutes dishonest behaviour.' - question: 'How much does it cost to get legal advice about theft charges in South Australia?' answer: 'Go To Court Lawyers offers a fixed consultation fee of $295 for criminal law matters including theft charges in South Australia. This consultation provides you with expert legal advice about your specific situation, potential defences, likely penalties, and strategic options for your case. Early legal advice is crucial for theft charges as it can significantly impact the outcome of your matter and help protect your criminal record and future opportunities.' - question: 'How can a criminal lawyer help with theft charges in South Australia?' answer: 'A criminal lawyer can assess available defences like lawful claim of right or mistake of fact, negotiate with prosecutors for reduced charges or alternative penalties, and represent you in court proceedings. They can examine the evidence against you, identify procedural issues, prepare compelling submissions for sentencing, and explore diversionary programs that may avoid criminal convictions. Experienced legal representation significantly improves your chances of achieving the best possible outcome for your theft matter.' - question: 'Are there time limits for prosecuting theft offences in South Australia?' answer: 'Most theft offences in South Australia must be prosecuted within specific limitation periods, though serious indictable theft matters may have extended time limits. Police investigations can move quickly, and charges may be laid promptly after allegations surface. It''s crucial to seek immediate legal advice if you''re under investigation or charged, as early intervention can preserve evidence, protect your rights during police interviews, and ensure proper legal procedures are followed throughout the process.' ---Need a Criminal Law lawyer in SA?
Speak to a qualified local lawyer now — free 24/7 hotline, no obligation.