The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
In order for an accused to be found guilty and convicted of a crime in NSW, the prosecution must be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person’s conduct was voluntary. Where a criminal act is committed in a state of automatism, this means that the offence was committed involuntarily. Case law makes it clear that if a crime was not committed voluntarily, then no crime has been committed and the accused must be found not guilty.
So what is automatism?
When an act is committed in the state of automatism, this means that the person committing the offence did so without any control or direction over what was being done. That is, their actions were involuntary and independent of their will.
This is different to acting out of necessity or duress, which is where one’s actions are necessary to survive or coerced by the will of another. Automatism refers to circumstances where a person is disassociated from the act, such that they are simply unable to control their own actions or conduct.
When relying upon this defence, the reason why this person is unable to control their actions or will must be due to some external factor which is out of their control. You are not able to use this defence if your actions were self-induced, or within your control, i.e. you deliberately took too much medication and suffered a bad reaction.
There are two types of automatism; sane automatism and insane automatism.
Sane automatism
Sane automatism refers to circumstances where a non-recurrent mental malfunction results in a person being unable to control their actions. The mental malfunction must be caused by an external factor, which was out of the person’s control. This may involve a physical incapacitation, or a psychological one.
Examples of sane automatism include offences committed whilst sleepwalking, suffering an epileptic fit or while under the influence of anaesthetic. Sane automatism can also occur when one’s conduct is the result of severe psychological trauma or post traumatic distress disorder.
For a defence of sane automatism to be raised, there are some essential elements that must be present:
- Some external factor caused the person to act the way they did;
- The actions were involuntary or unintentional; and
- The actions were not a result of a mental illness, rather a non-recurrent mental malfunction.
When this defence is raised, it is not the accused’s responsibility to prove that they were acting in a state of automatism. Rather, the prosecution must prove that the accused was acting voluntarily.
Insane automatism
Insane automatism arises when a ‘disease of the mind’ is present. This means that the accused’s state of mind was one of disease, disorder or disturbance arising from some condition. This disease or illness must have influenced the person’s actions or understanding of those actions.
When the defence of insane automatism is raised, the accused must prove on the balance of probabilities that:
- They were suffering from a ‘disease of the mind’ (i.e. mentally ill) at the time of the act; and
- As a result of this illness or disease, the accused did not appreciate the nature and quality of that act, or, did not know that it was wrong.
What happens if the court finds I acted in a state of automatism?
If a defence of sane automatism is accepted in court, the accused will be found not guilty. If an accused is found to have acted in a state of insane automatism, meaning that the accused was mentally ill, they will be found ‘not guilty by way of mental illness’. A finding of ‘not guilty’ and ‘not guilty by way of mental illness’ are very different results.
You should seek advice from a Criminal Lawyer as to whether the defence of automatism is available to you, and which category of automatism applies to your case.
If you require legal advice or representation in a criminal matter or in any other legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Related Content
Taylor McAnderson
Senior Federal Prosecutor
Taylor holds a Bachelor of Laws, a Bachelor of Social Science and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice. Taylor was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Taylor is extremely versatile in her approach to legal matters. Whether she is inside or outside the courtroom, she aims to be a strong advocate for her clients in order to achieve the best possible results. Taylor believes that thorough preparation and strong communication skills are crucial in achieving these results.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
Defence of Self-Defence in South Australia
In South Australia, a person is permitted to use reasonable force to physically defend themselves, another person or their property. The criminal defence of self-defence requires the accused to have acted in a way that was reasonable in the circumstances and for their defensive conduct to have been proportionate to ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Emergency (WA) All Australian jurisdictions have some form of the defence of emergency. In Western Australia, this defence is outlined in section 25 of the Criminal Code Act. This page explores the defence of emergency in WA. Legislation Under section 25 of the Criminal Code Act, a ....
Posted in:
Defences
A person has a full legal defence to any criminal charge if at the time of the alleged offence they were suffering from a mental disease or impairment that prevented them from understanding or controlling their actions. In Queensland, this defence is set out in section 27 of the Criminal ....
Posted in:
Defences
A person who is charged with criminal offences may contest the charge and rely on a legal defence such as self-defence or duress. An accused person may also rely on a factual defence such as an alibi. An alibi exists where a person was not at the scene of the ....
Posted in:
Defences
Evidence
Where an accused suggests that they committed an offence involuntarily, they are raising the defence of automatism. The defence of automatism arises from one of the very basic principles of criminal law that is embedded in case law: that an accused cannot be found guilty of an act which occurred ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Provocation The defence of provocation can be relied on in certain contexts in some Australian states and territories. However, its application is generally very limited and in some jurisdictions, the defence no longer exists. This page deals with the defence of provocation in Australia. What is provocation? ....
Posted in:
Defences
Self-Defence in the Northern Territory
Self-Defence in the Northern Territory In the Northern Territory, self-defence is a full defence to any offence that involves the unlawful use of force. The defence is set out in section 43BD of the Criminal Code 1983. This page deals with self-defence in the NT. What is self-defence? A person ....
Posted in:
Defences
Criminal Defences (NT) The criminal defences that can be relied on in Northern Territory courts are set out in the Criminal Code Act 1983. Most of these are based on common law defences that have been developed through successive court decisions in the UK and Australia. This article briefly outlines ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defence of Consent In Australia, the offence of rape allows for a legal defence if the victim gave their consent to sexual intercourse. Rape is also known as sexual penetration without consent or sexual assault, and consent is the sole legal defence to these charges. Rape is defined differently in ....
Posted in:
Defences
Under West Australian law, there’s a home invasion defence that could potentially be relied on by homeowners or occupants who’ve used force to defend themselves against a home invader in Western Australia. It could possibly be raised as a defence in situations where they’ve subsequently been charged with a criminal offence such ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Self-Defence (NSW)
The law recognises a person’s right to protect themselves when they are being physically attacked or are faced with a threat of physical violence. The extent to which it is permissible to use violence in self-defence depends on the circumstances and the extent of the threat faced. In New South Wales, ....
Posted in:
Defences
Honest and Reasonable Mistake in Brisbane
Honest and Reasonable Mistake in Brisbane Honest and reasonable mistake of fact can be relied on as a defence only in relation to strict liability offences. Strict liability offences do not require the accused to have intended to commit the crime in order to be found guilty, but only for ....
Posted in:
Defences