Call our lawyers
now
or,
have our lawyers
call you
The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
Updated on Nov 21, 2022 • 4 min read • 535 views • Copy Link
The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
In order for an accused to be found guilty and convicted of a crime in NSW, the prosecution must be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person’s conduct was voluntary. Where a criminal act is committed in a state of automatism, this means that the offence was committed involuntarily. Case law makes it clear that if a crime was not committed voluntarily, then no crime has been committed and the accused must be found not guilty.
So what is automatism?
When an act is committed in the state of automatism, this means that the person committing the offence did so without any control or direction over what was being done. That is, their actions were involuntary and independent of their will.
This is different to acting out of necessity or duress, which is where one’s actions are necessary to survive or coerced by the will of another. Automatism refers to circumstances where a person is disassociated from the act, such that they are simply unable to control their own actions or conduct.
When relying upon this defence, the reason why this person is unable to control their actions or will must be due to some external factor which is out of their control. You are not able to use this defence if your actions were self-induced, or within your control, i.e. you deliberately took too much medication and suffered a bad reaction.
There are two types of automatism; sane automatism and insane automatism.
Sane automatism
Sane automatism refers to circumstances where a non-recurrent mental malfunction results in a person being unable to control their actions. The mental malfunction must be caused by an external factor, which was out of the person’s control. This may involve a physical incapacitation, or a psychological one.
Examples of sane automatism include offences committed whilst sleepwalking, suffering an epileptic fit or while under the influence of anaesthetic. Sane automatism can also occur when one’s conduct is the result of severe psychological trauma or post traumatic distress disorder.
For a defence of sane automatism to be raised, there are some essential elements that must be present:
- Some external factor caused the person to act the way they did;
- The actions were involuntary or unintentional; and
- The actions were not a result of a mental illness, rather a non-recurrent mental malfunction.
When this defence is raised, it is not the accused’s responsibility to prove that they were acting in a state of automatism. Rather, the prosecution must prove that the accused was acting voluntarily.
Insane automatism
Insane automatism arises when a ‘disease of the mind’ is present. This means that the accused’s state of mind was one of disease, disorder or disturbance arising from some condition. This disease or illness must have influenced the person’s actions or understanding of those actions.
When the defence of insane automatism is raised, the accused must prove on the balance of probabilities that:
- They were suffering from a ‘disease of the mind’ (i.e. mentally ill) at the time of the act; and
- As a result of this illness or disease, the accused did not appreciate the nature and quality of that act, or, did not know that it was wrong.
What happens if the court finds I acted in a state of automatism?
If a defence of sane automatism is accepted in court, the accused will be found not guilty. If an accused is found to have acted in a state of insane automatism, meaning that the accused was mentally ill, they will be found ‘not guilty by way of mental illness’. A finding of ‘not guilty’ and ‘not guilty by way of mental illness’ are very different results.
You should seek advice from a Criminal Lawyer as to whether the defence of automatism is available to you, and which category of automatism applies to your case.
If you require legal advice or representation in a criminal matter or in any other legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Related Content
Voir Dires in Victoria
Character References in Victoria
Horsham Criminal Lawyers | Expert Criminal Solicitors
Bendigo Criminal Lawyers | Expert Criminal Solicitors
Personal Searches in Victoria
Benalla Criminal Lawyers | Expert Criminal Solicitors
Warrnambool Criminal Lawyers | Expert Criminal Solicitors
Age of Consent (Vic)
Taylor McAnderson
Senior Federal Prosecutor
Taylor holds a Bachelor of Laws, a Bachelor of Social Science and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice. Taylor was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Taylor is extremely versatile in her approach to legal matters. Whether she is inside or outside the courtroom, she aims to be a strong advocate for her clients in order to achieve the best possible results. Taylor believes that thorough preparation and strong communication skills are crucial in achieving these results.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
Justifiable Force (NT) Under the NT Criminal Code 1983, there are a number of situations where a person is permitted to use physical force and where doing so does not amount to an offence. If a person is charged with an offence involving violence and they were acting defensively or ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defence of Consent In Australia, the offence of rape allows for a legal defence if the victim gave their consent to sexual intercourse. Rape is also known as sexual penetration without consent or sexual assault, and consent is the sole legal defence to these charges. Rape is defined differently in ....
Posted in:
Defences
Age of Criminal Liability in Brisbane
Age of Criminal Liability in Brisbane The minimum age of criminal liability is the age at which a person can be arrested or summonsed for, charged with and found guilty of a criminal offence. The age of criminal liability in Brisbane and the rest of Queensland is currently 10. This ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Provocation in Brisbane
The Defence of Provocation in Brisbane The defence of provocation in Brisbane can be relied on as a full defence to assault or as a partial defence to murder. It is codified in the Criminal Code 1899 sections 268 and 269. In recent years, Queensland has debated whether it is still appropriate ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Insanity (WA) The defence of insanity provides that an individual cannot be convicted of a criminal offence if, at the time of the act, they were suffering from a severe mental illness that rendered them unable to comprehend their actions or exercise control over them. This defence ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Mistake in Queensland
The defence of mistake in Queensland, which is set out in section 24 of the Queensland Criminal Code 1899, applies to accused persons who acted under an ‘honest and reasonable, but mistaken, belief in the existence of any state of things’ when they committed the offence. This defence applies only to ....
Posted in:
Defences
Honest and Reasonable Mistake in Brisbane
Honest and Reasonable Mistake in Brisbane Honest and reasonable mistake of fact can be relied on as a defence only in relation to strict liability offences. Strict liability offences do not require the accused to have intended to commit the crime in order to be found guilty, but only for ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defences to Criminal Charges in New South Wales
A person who has been charged with a criminal offence may rely on a legal or a factual defence. Examples of factual defences are alibis and identification cases. Legal defences include self-defence and duress. A defence may be complete or partial. Most criminal defences have their roots in the common ....
Posted in:
Defences
Age of Criminal Liability in Tasmania
Age of Criminal Liability in Tasmania In Tasmania, no child younger than ten may be arrested or convicted of a criminal offence. In fact, the age of criminal liability is ten years in all Australian states and territories. The Criminal Code Act 1924 dictates that no act or omission by ....
Posted in:
Defences
Criminal Defences in South Australia
The legal defences that a person can rely on when charged with a criminal offence in South Australia are set out in the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935. This article summarises the legal criminal defences in South Australia. What is a legal defence? A legal defence exists when a person ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Automatism (WA)
The Defence of Automatism (WA) Automatism refers to the involuntary conduct of a person caused by the lack of conscious volition. It includes actions or conduct such as: Sleepwalking; Episodes of epilepsy; Dissociation caused by physical trauma such as a blow to the head, resulting in severe concussion; Drug-induced psychosis; ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Age of Criminal Responsibility (NT)
The Age of Criminal Responsibility (NT) The age of criminal responsibility is the age that a person can be arrested, summonsed, charged with and found guilty of criminal offences. On 1 August 2023, the NT became the first Australian jurisdiction to raise the age of criminal liability from the previous ....
Posted in:
Defences