Call our lawyers
now
or,
have our lawyers
call you
The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
Updated on Nov 21, 2022 • 4 min read • 561 views • Copy Link
The Defence of Automatism (NSW)
In order for an accused to be found guilty and convicted of a crime in NSW, the prosecution must be able to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the person’s conduct was voluntary. Where a criminal act is committed in a state of automatism, this means that the offence was committed involuntarily. Case law makes it clear that if a crime was not committed voluntarily, then no crime has been committed and the accused must be found not guilty.
So what is automatism?
When an act is committed in the state of automatism, this means that the person committing the offence did so without any control or direction over what was being done. That is, their actions were involuntary and independent of their will.
This is different to acting out of necessity or duress, which is where one’s actions are necessary to survive or coerced by the will of another. Automatism refers to circumstances where a person is disassociated from the act, such that they are simply unable to control their own actions or conduct.
When relying upon this defence, the reason why this person is unable to control their actions or will must be due to some external factor which is out of their control. You are not able to use this defence if your actions were self-induced, or within your control, i.e. you deliberately took too much medication and suffered a bad reaction.
There are two types of automatism; sane automatism and insane automatism.
Sane automatism
Sane automatism refers to circumstances where a non-recurrent mental malfunction results in a person being unable to control their actions. The mental malfunction must be caused by an external factor, which was out of the person’s control. This may involve a physical incapacitation, or a psychological one.
Examples of sane automatism include offences committed whilst sleepwalking, suffering an epileptic fit or while under the influence of anaesthetic. Sane automatism can also occur when one’s conduct is the result of severe psychological trauma or post traumatic distress disorder.
For a defence of sane automatism to be raised, there are some essential elements that must be present:
- Some external factor caused the person to act the way they did;
- The actions were involuntary or unintentional; and
- The actions were not a result of a mental illness, rather a non-recurrent mental malfunction.
When this defence is raised, it is not the accused’s responsibility to prove that they were acting in a state of automatism. Rather, the prosecution must prove that the accused was acting voluntarily.
Insane automatism
Insane automatism arises when a ‘disease of the mind’ is present. This means that the accused’s state of mind was one of disease, disorder or disturbance arising from some condition. This disease or illness must have influenced the person’s actions or understanding of those actions.
When the defence of insane automatism is raised, the accused must prove on the balance of probabilities that:
- They were suffering from a ‘disease of the mind’ (i.e. mentally ill) at the time of the act; and
- As a result of this illness or disease, the accused did not appreciate the nature and quality of that act, or, did not know that it was wrong.
What happens if the court finds I acted in a state of automatism?
If a defence of sane automatism is accepted in court, the accused will be found not guilty. If an accused is found to have acted in a state of insane automatism, meaning that the accused was mentally ill, they will be found ‘not guilty by way of mental illness’. A finding of ‘not guilty’ and ‘not guilty by way of mental illness’ are very different results.
You should seek advice from a Criminal Lawyer as to whether the defence of automatism is available to you, and which category of automatism applies to your case.
If you require legal advice or representation in a criminal matter or in any other legal matter, please contact Go To Court Lawyers.
Related Content
Perverting the Course of Justice (Vic)
Police Powers and Young People (Vic)
Common Assault in Victoria
Heidelberg Criminal Lawyers | Expert Criminal Solicitors
The Defence of Self-Defence (Vic)
Referrals to Diversion (Vic)
Important Changes to the Infringement System (Vic)
The Right to Silence (Vic)
Taylor McAnderson
Senior Federal Prosecutor
Taylor holds a Bachelor of Laws, a Bachelor of Social Science and a Graduate Diploma of Legal Practice. Taylor was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Taylor is extremely versatile in her approach to legal matters. Whether she is inside or outside the courtroom, she aims to be a strong advocate for her clients in order to achieve the best possible results. Taylor believes that thorough preparation and strong communication skills are crucial in achieving these results.
Affordable Lawyers
Our Go To Court Lawyers will assist you in all areas of law. We specialise in providing legal advice urgently – at the time when you need it most. If you need a lawyer right now, today, we can help you – no matter where you are in Australia.How It Works
1. You speak directly to a lawyer
When you call the Go To Court Legal Hotline, you will be connected directly to a lawyer, every time.
2. Get your legal situation assessed
We determine the best way forward in your legal matter, free of charge. If you want to go ahead and book a face-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area.
3. We arrange everything as needed
If you want to go ahead and book a fact-to-face appointment, we will connect you with a specialist in your local area no matter where you are and even at very short notice.
Related Law Topics
A person has a full legal defence to any criminal charge if at the time of the alleged offence they were suffering from a mental disease or impairment that prevented them from understanding or controlling their actions. In Queensland, this defence is set out in section 27 of the Criminal ....
Posted in:
Defences
Compulsion in Tasmania The defence of compulsion in Tasmania is the defence that is known as duress in other jurisdictions. It is codified in section 20 of the Criminal Code Act 1924. Compulsion provides a defence to some criminal offences in Tasmania where a person can show that they were essentially ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Mental Incompetence (SA)
A person in South Australia has a legal defence to any criminal charge if they were mentally incompetent to commit an offence. This defence is contained in section 269 of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935. The procedures that are followed in cases involving mental incompetence depend on the nature ....
Posted in:
Defences
Defence of Self-Defence This page deals with the criminal defence of self-defence, which can be invoked by an accused person who uses force in response to a perceived threat of harm. Self-defence allows an accused person to assert that their actions were warranted because they were protecting themselves, another person, ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Honest and Reasonable Mistake (Qld)
Honest and Reasonable Mistake Defence (Qld) Certain criminal offences fall under the category of ‘strict liability offences.’ These are offences for which the prosecution is not required to prove that the accused had an intention to commit the crime. In other words, a strict liability offence does not have a ....
Posted in:
Defences
Corporal Punishment of Children (WA)
Corporal Punishment of Children (WA) In Western Australia, criminal law permits a person to physically discipline a child under some circumstances. The reasonable discipline of a child may be used as a defence to a charge of assault if the accused person was acting in the capacity of a parent. ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Insanity in Tasmania
The Defence of Insanity in Tasmania A person is not guilty of a criminal offence if they were suffering from a mental illness which meant they were unable to understand what they were doing or were unable to understand that they ought not to do it. The defence of insanity ....
Posted in:
Defences
Criminal Law Defences in Victoria
Criminal Law Defences in Victoria When a person is charged with a criminal offence, the police need to prove to the court beyond a reasonable doubt that they are guilty. A person can defend a criminal charge by relying of a factual defence – such as an alibi or identification ....
Posted in:
Defences
Criminal Defences (NT) The criminal defences that can be relied on in Northern Territory courts are set out in the Criminal Code Act 1983. Most of these are based on common law defences that have been developed through successive court decisions in the UK and Australia. This article briefly outlines ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Provocation (WA)
The Defence of Provocation (WA) The defence of provocation is available in Western Australia under the Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 for certain assault offences. Essentially, this defence means that a person is not criminally responsible for an assault they committed if the victim provoked the assault. In this ....
Posted in:
Defences
The Defence of Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility (Qld)
The minimum age of criminal responsibility is the age at which young persons can be arrested for, charged with and found guilty of a criminal offence. In Queensland the minimum age of criminal responsibility is currently 10 (Queensland Criminal Code Act 1899, Section 29). However, the Queensland government has given ....
Posted in:
Defences
Criminal Defences in Tasmania When a person is Tasmania is charged with a criminal offence, there are a number of legal defences that they may rely on. These are set out in the Criminal Code Act 1924. Many criminal defences are broadly consistent across all Australian jurisdictions as they are ....
Posted in:
Defences